Quote:
Originally Posted by arcus
That's interesting.
Why should the price of the shares increase if a company decides to delist? Isn't delisting a "bad" thing?
|
Delisting of a company can be good or bad, depending on why the company is being delisted.
When a company is suspended or delisted because it fails to comply with laws/rules/regulations, it is bad for the investors as they are left with shares that can't be traded.
In case of
voluntary delisting, the promoters themself delist the company by buying out the minority shareholders.
If the promoters of a company want to delist it,
- the promoters have to buyout at least 50% of the minority shares.
- reduce the minority shareholding to less than 10% (take the promoter shareholding to above 90%).
Both the above conditions have to be satisfied.
Let's take the case of Fairfield Atlas.
In Fairfield Atlas, the promoter shareholding is 83.91% and public shareholding is 16.09%.
If the promoters want to delist the company, they have to buy at least 50% of the public shares (8.05% of the total shares).
(If they are able to buy 8.05% of the shares, 90% condition will be met too).
In case of voluntary delisting, minority shareholders are free to ask for
any price that they want. Minority shareholders always ask for a significant premium over the market price and thus every time promoters decide to delist a company, the share price of that company jumps.
Delisting price has to be fixed at such a level that
both the above mentioned conditions are met.
Of course,
promoters may or may not accept that price.
Those shareholders who don't want to accept the delisting price, can continue to hold the shares after delisting.