alchemist i read this thread and tried calculating PE ratio however i could not come to the basic or diluted EPS result provided in the table itself can you just go through the result table of Power Grid and let us know how to come to the EPS value provided in the table which is ".96" the table that i request you to use is here.
let us know how to come to the EPS value provided in the table which is ".96"
The net profit figure of Power Grid for FY 2008 Q2 is Rs 371.22 crore.
The number of shares outstanding are 420.88 crore.
(The equity is Rs 4208.8 crore and shares are of face value Rs 10 each).
You can also find the number of shares outstanding in this thread on Power Grid.
The eps can be obtained by dividing the net profit by number of shares = Rs 0.88.
The figure mentioned is higher at Rs 0.96 because during Q2, the number of shares outstanding were less. Before the IPO, the number of shares outstanding were 382.62 crore.
While calculating quarterly (or annual) eps, companies use average number of shares outstanding for any quarter (or year.)
I read somewhere that PE Ratio of Essar Oil as on 12th March is -489 and EPS is -0.49, How is it possible to have an earnings of minus figure? Is it the expenditure of the company is more than income?
I read somewhere that PE Ratio of Essar Oil as on 12th March is -489 and EPS is -0.49, How is it possible to have an earnings of minus figure? Is it the expenditure of the company is more than income?
Regards
Reji
That means that the company is making loss and hence the earning is in negative.
eps=Profit/total shares
note that eps figure varies depending on the period you choose for calculating it ., like quarterly/annual etc.,
Last edited by InvestorB : 15th March 2008 at 10:50 PM.
I read somewhere that PE Ratio of Essar Oil as on 12th March is -489 and EPS is -0.49, How is it possible to have an earnings of minus figure? Is it the expenditure of the company is more than income?
Regards
Reji
For loss making companies, the PE ratio will be negative.
(PE ratio cannot be used for valuing loss-making companies).
you make good explanations there. now i understand PEG better. i have never used this term before. can i say a lower PEG is better?
i was searching the web on how to calculate pe ratio of an index and came across your forum first.
i was trying to calculate the pe ratio of my country index but seems to get a value which is questionable. i got a pe of as low as 6.91 which i think is not right. i have published the calculation in a blog but i dont think its nice of me to put it at my first post.
maybe can you help me to calculate the pe ratio of a fictitious index consisting of 2 stocks. i just want to confirm my understanding on how to calculate it. also for the benefits of others who may find this exercise useful
stock A
price = $3.63
market cap = $8332M
shares = 3228M
free float factor = 0.75
rolling eps = $1.423
stock B
price = $15.82
market cap = $17229
shares = 354M
free float factor = 0.3
rolling eps = $1.125
maybe can you help me to calculate the pe ratio of a fictitious index consisting of 2 stocks. i just want to confirm my understanding on how to calculate it. also for the benefits of others who may find this exercise useful
Unless I know how this fictitious index is calculated, I won't be able to calculate the PE ratio.
PE ratio for different stocks is different.
Ignore the rest of the post. It is incorrect. See post #26.
PE ratio can never be used alone to make a buy or sell decision.
However PE ratio can be used to
- compare stocks in the same industry.
- compare a stock's valuation to its valuations in the past.
Hello Sir,
I have following questions regarding PE ratio.
1) Does it mean that after buying a scrip which fits this criteria,I should wait for the PE to match its avg.industry PE or its own highest multiple level?
If I am not getting it right,please tell me how to use this ratio for selling a stock?
2) where can I get to know "historical/past" PE ratio band of a scrip?
I kindly request you to please explain and help me.
P.S. I am not fluent in English so please bare with me.
Gertrude Stein said, "A rose is a rose is a rose," but the same cannot be said about earnings per share (EPS).
While the math may be simple, there are many varieties of EPS being used these days, and investors must understand what each one represents if they're to make informed investment decisions. For example, the EPS announced by the company may differ significantly from what is reported in the financial statements and in the headlines. As a result, a stock may appear over- or undervalued depending on the EPS being used. ...
"Our ongoing analysis of the most successful stocks from 1880 to the present shows that, contrary to most investors' beliefs, P-E ratios were not a relevant factor in price movement," IBD's founder and chairman, William O'Neil, writes in "How to Make Money in Stocks."
Last edited by vasa1 : 5th February 2010 at 06:50 AM.
Value-focused investors use P-E ratios to determine buy opportunities. If a stock is performing below the industry's average, generally it is deemed undervalued and a buy opportunity.
That's definitely not true.
That's not how value investors make their decisions.
A value investor does look at the PE ratio, but not in isolation.
He looks are many other factors like
- quality of earnings.
- sustainability of earnings.
- growth potential of company and industry.
- quality of management.
- relative position of the company in the industry.
- nature of business.
etc.
PE ratio works much better than most other tools that an investor has, but it works only for those who know how to use it.
"O'Neil emphasizes the importance of choosing stocks whose earnings per share (EPS) in the most recent quarter have grown on a yearly basis. For example, a company's EPS figures reported in this year's April-June quarter should have grown relative to the EPS figures for that same three-month period one year ago."
Anyway, time to get the shopping list ready. I suspect discount season is here...